Move over James Bond – here comes Flame!

Innovation is the name of the game and applies not only to businesses but espionage as well. Gone are the days when 007 was sent to sort out Blofeld. Bond is about to be made redundant and most of his work will be done online. Devote 2 minutes to watching  a cyber security expert explain the workings of espionage program Flame that is targeting governments and businesses in the Middle East:

Iran and Israel/Palestine have been the main targets which have made experts all over the world believe that America and/or Israel is behind it.

The New York Times have looked into Struxnet and Olympic Games (the code name given to it already by the Bush White House) for 18 months. According to their article, Struxnet suddenly started spreading into computers outside the Iranian nuclear plant and the Americans believed the Israelis had done something to enable that. Maybe that was the beginning of Flame? If so, it wouldn't surprise me if the hackers that work for Israel's Unit 8200, that I wrote about in  Cyber Warfare – Hackers to the rescue, were behind it. Maybe it's time to make "hacker" a profession and enable more of them to use their skills in positive ways to protect governments and businesses against this kind of attacks, instead of in destructive ways?

Imagine a virus that can delay exports

Flame not only steals information but is also said to have disrupted oil exports by shutting down Iranian oil terminals. But then again,  Struxnet destroyed some of Iran's nuclear centrifuges. 

What nation state is behind it?

security official in China was arrested this year for spying for the US. Maybe he handed over the information needed to get Flame into Chinese networks and places of interest?

Can't help wondering if some other nation could be behind Flame? The Chinese government is actually known for their cyber activities and so is Russia and Iran. But according to the above mentioned article in The New York Times, the era of viruses such as Flame started when George W. Bush was president. Having falsely accused Iraq of having weapons of mass destruction he had no credibility for, again, accusing a country of nuclear ambitions. And the Iranians knew it. So when Bush was presented with the opinion of cyber warfare he found the sophisticated cyber weapon too good to resist. Obama followed suit and in fact speeded up cyber attacks against the Iranians. 

Just read an article in in Foreign Policy Magazine asking if there are US special ops inside North Korea. Maybe to find the information needed to get Flame into places of interest in Pyongyang? If so, in the future Flame and its successors may take care of espionage in North Korea as well. The new cyber spy tool sounds to me not only to be up to the task but able to penetrate where ops cannot thread. 

The beginning of a new era

Seems to me that using viruses like Flame is the way of the future for espionage. Catch is, all nations will follow suit, if they haven't already. And that includes Iran and North Korea. In fact, how long will it take before Iran pays the US and Israel back for Struxnet?  It's essential for all countries in the world to boost their ability to withstand such attacks. And the same applies to businesses who may otherwise have their secrets stolen and their markets taken away. 

Do you believe viruses such as Flame is the way of the future? Should all countries and businesses increase their ability to withstand such attacks?Are the US and/or Israel behind Flame? Will the number of James Bonds in the world be gradually reduced? Catch is the Blofelds of this world neither are, not will be, in decline. Should hacking be made a profession in order to benefit from their skills? Is privacy gradually becoming a thing of the past? Will we all have to get used to a world where everything is seen and heard? If so, will the 007s or Blofelds be the winners? Or maybe the Bond Girls? If so, hopefully the good flames that end up with Bond in the end. The current Flame beats most honey traps, after all.

Video: ReutersTV -YouTube

19 responses

  1. Scary isn't it? It is essential for governments to strengthen cyber security. But at the same time, governments should not get so alarmed that they put stringent curbs on use of the internet (perhaps this is another story altogether as it deals much more with freedom of speech than cyber security).
    I can so visualise books and movies emerging on cyber wars.
    My recent post If Truth were to be Told

  2. This is truly scary. In order to combate it. It is best to be on the offense. Other wise we will always be catching up, A very costly endeavor. Much more costly then offensively protecting ourselves.
    My recent post A Resident Ghost Story

  3. I have been aware of this for some time now. What’s scary to me is not that this stuff exists, it’s that our government has taken few steps to actually protect us against it. They are always chasing after what has already happened and not what will likely happen in the future. There is always the possibility that I am wrong and they are working on how to protect us from ‘skynet’. The track record usually proves otherwise.

  4. Hacking is already a profession – many businesses and governments use "White Hats" to test the security of their systems and ensure they are reasonably safe from intrusion. Of course, hacking evolves and so today's 'safe site' is hackable tomorrow.

    As for Stuxnet, and others – this is much safer for people than the older forms of espionage, but can have wider effects. Much has already been written about the potential catastrophe if/when somebody hacks into the US power grid and shuts it down. Imagine the impact of somebody shutting down the NYSE or NASDAQ. The question is, can this be prevented?

    I see the incidence of hackers impacting critical government, and other, sites growing in the years ahead. Bond will be less suave and more geeky…

  5. This has been making news in Australia lately and I wonder if they got some inspiration from movies. Seriously you have to wonder if governments are vulnerable what people can do to protect themselves especially as some freely give away so much information. I also wonder the role of Russia in all this rather than USA and Israel.
    My recent post Make It Count To Enjoy Marketing Success

  6. This is very scary for our government and especially on cyber world. I hope that they will have a solution for this.
    My recent post בני

  7. Glad you like it, Steve. As I wrote to Guy, there are good hackers. But regardless of that it should become a profession, and a highly paid one at that . That way we can get hackers that are up to no good to opt for a highly paid position as a hacker instead. That should have a positive impact on society.

    By the way, if a company would like to advertise for a hacker what do they call the position?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *